Comments on: Suppressing scientific facts http://bloy.net/2006/01/29/suppressing-scientific-facts/ the website of Jonathan Bloy Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:29:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jonathan http://bloy.net/2006/01/29/suppressing-scientific-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-58 Jonathan Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:29:49 +0000 http://www.bloy.net/archive/2006/01/29/suppressing-scientific-facts/#comment-58 Funny you should mention Exxon Mobil. From today's news: <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=businessNews&storyID=2006-01-30T131754Z_01_WAA000163_RTRUKOC_0_US-ENERGY-EXXON-EARNS.xml" rel="nofollow">Exxon profit surges 27 percent, capping record year</a>. I guess it's all good as long as you can keep raking in the dough. [sigh] Funny you should mention Exxon Mobil. From today’s news: Exxon profit surges 27 percent, capping record year.

I guess it’s all good as long as you can keep raking in the dough. [sigh]

]]> By: kirstin http://bloy.net/2006/01/29/suppressing-scientific-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-57 kirstin Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:10:31 +0000 http://www.bloy.net/archive/2006/01/29/suppressing-scientific-facts/#comment-57 There is no leadership in environmental affairs unless ExxonMobil says there is. Exxon doesn't even admit the scientific validity of Global Warming (even internally). With corporate interests funding this Republican administration, nothing factual will ever get out. There is no leadership in environmental affairs unless ExxonMobil says there is. Exxon doesn’t even admit the scientific validity of Global Warming (even internally).
With corporate interests funding this Republican administration, nothing factual will ever get out.

]]>