Archive for June, 2006

Cahokia Mounds

Sunday, June 4th, 2006

Yesterday I returned home from a vacation, the main point of which was to visit Cahokia Mounds, in south-western Illinois (about 13 miles east of St Louis).

Twin Mounds at Cahokia

Cahokia Mounds are the remnants of a native civilization that at one time, was probably home to 10,000-20,000 people.

read the rest of: Cahokia Mounds

Bloy Genealogical Theory

Tuesday, June 6th, 2006

Over past few days I’ve been exchanging emails with a Bloy from France (who discovered this web site). What I found most interesting was what he had to say about Bloys in France during a 17th century religious war.

I believe that during the religious war in France (civilian war between catholics and protestants- 17 century) a lot of Bloys from this part of France (well known also for [catholicism]) had left such an unsafe place for Germany.

On this site’s About page, I mention a theory an uncle of mine has, about Bloys who were French Huguenots that moved to Germany to avoid religious persecution. It’s interesting to note he’s not the only one with this theory.

Land of Lincoln

Friday, June 9th, 2006

While I was in Illinois last week to see Cahokia Mounds, I also stopped at a few other historic places.

Bust of Lincoln

read the rest of: Land of Lincoln

Random links

Saturday, June 17th, 2006

Just a few interesting links I’ve come across lately.

Engine 261

Saturday, June 24th, 2006

An excursion train with Milwaukee Road Engine 261 (an old steam locomotive) ran from Milwaukee to the Wisconsin Dells today.

Milwaukee Road Engine 261

read the rest of: Engine 261

There is no more after 100 percent

Friday, June 30th, 2006

Just reading a political blog tonight and one of the comments struck a nerve with me.

I am in most ways opposed to [a politician's] plans and views of what America should be. YET this time we agree 10000%.

Ten thousand percent? How can someone agree ten thousand percent? One of the comments you invariably hear during interviews with sports stars is they are going to give 110% at the next game. How can a player give more than the possible effort they can give?

The librarian in me is compelled to look up the word percentage. The Oxford English Dictionary has this definition:

Any part or portion considered in its quantitative relation to the whole, a proportion (of something).

The whole is 100 percent. A person can only give 100 percent. If they give it their all, that is 100 percent. They cannot give more. If a player reaches deep down and comes up with that extra effort, that is the whole of what they could do — it is 100 percent. There is no more after 100 percent.

That type of comment is even more absurd when it comes to arguments. You cannot agree (or disagree) with someone more than 100 percent. I’m guessing people who make such statements probably got less than 100% on their math tests in school.